It's one of my favorite quotes and I'd like to hear a reasoned answer. If you're going to call something evil, okay, but you need to establish on what basis something is evil. Is he able, but not willing? Answer to: What is the Epicurean paradox? The epi curean paradox must not be viewed in a negative way as in the absence of God but rat her be seen as a means to recognize God. Sameerian answers to Epicurean paradox. Epicurean paradox. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread. Re: The Epicurean Paradox. Then he is not omnipotent. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. The Epicurean paradox. Whether or not God exists is probably the most important question of all human philosophy. You know dipstick if you are going to ask people about a something you should post it God@gmail.com will god return my email. by oaroloye ( m ): 12:32pm On Nov 24 , 2016 Why, then, do you gull us seeking to lead us into that which we are forbidden to know, are unable to know, and which you do not know yourself? The Epicurean Paradox: If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to then he is not omnipotent. Which version of God do you find more favorable. The problem of evil, also known as the Riddle of Epicurus, states: If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to. Epicurus expressed problem of evil or "the Epicurean paradox" while questioning the omnipotent nature of God. He can’t stop a thief from stealing someone’s money because humans should have free will. (Epicurean paradox question) User Info: bidas100. in the bottom left "could god have created a universe with free-will but without evil"? See "the problem of evil" and "theodicy" https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/#The. but then "free-will" doesn't mage sense to arrive at the left choice again. The article in the third link also destroys this argument against the existence of God. Then whence cometh evil? 3.A perfectly good being would want to prevent all evils. Answers must portray an accurate picture of the issue and the philosophical literature. It's illogical. it's logically fallacious. The whole wicked and impotent part is just an opinion, not an objective fact. Acts 26:8 Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead? Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban. Re: The "Epicurean Paradox… Reply Quote. So God isn’t evil even though He permits and therefore wills evil to be done. Then he is malevolent. Nor do I doubt that he will quote me to you as saying that God desires sin. I bring this up only because Hume himself (a philosopher atheists love to quote) admitted to the possibility: It ignores free will. Textual analysis was used as a methodology to describe and interpret the content, structure, and functions of the messages contained in various texts The paper aimed to fully answer and give definite responses to what may be a challenging “Epicurean paradox”. “God,” he says, “either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able.”. Ponderer. Genesis 50:20 But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive. And if God does not exist there is no basis to complain about evil - as there would not be objectively any such thing as evil. More memes, funny videos and pics on 9GAG. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Then He is malevolent. This isn't my answer, but it is a Christian answer: Article by 9GAG. Please read our rules before commenting and understand that your comments will be removed if they are not up to standard or otherwise break the rules. Epicurus (341-270 BCE) was an ancient Greek philosopher known today (particularly in skeptical circles) for providing what some claim is a knockdown argument against belief in God. My understanding of Hindu philosophy and my belief is that good and evil are two sides of the same coin. If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to 9, 20: 'O man, who art thou that repliest against God?' "His wisdom is infinite: He is never mistaken in choosing the means to any end: But the course of nature tends not to human or animal felicity: Therefore it is not established for that purpose. 5. I want to claim entry to win $600.00 a week for life pch gwy no. tuk22. However In the Pit, The Void, The Darknesseternial seperation can be found. It might seem to follow but I don’t accept it does. Does God exist? The Epicurean paradox or riddle of Epicurus or Epicurus' trilemma is a version of the problem of evil. there's one thing that bothers me with this flow chart. 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, haughty, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, disloyal, 3 having no natural affection, not open to any agreement, slanderers, without self-control, fierce, without love of goodness, 4 betrayers, headstrong, puffed up with pride, lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God, 5 having an appearance of godliness but proving false to its power; and from these turn away" (2 Timothy 3:1-5. There does happen to be a response to the problem of evil - what is here framed as the Epicurean paradox - a response which I, as an atheist, find more palatable than most. Epicurean paradox. One more thing, what about for natural evils such as infections and tsunamis? 2.God is omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good. Then why call Him God? Bible). In what way, however, He permits or wills sin, this we shall leave unanswered (sollen wir gehen lassen). lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God... Matthew 22:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. Is he both able and willing? "The so-called riddle itself is a false dilemma. A false dilemma is a type of informal fallacy that involves a situation in which limited alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option. Friend: "If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to, Answer: You can't. The existence of free will seems the most persuasive to me at least. 15000 Audrey Thornhill. Haitian Men, Dominican Men, and Jamaican Men are the world's most faithful men? 25% (2 votes) 2. Welcome to r/askphilosophy. Good and bad/evil actions done by living beings are, at least partly, out of choice. Consider what the paradox says in the very first sentence: either God cannot abolish evil or God chooses not to. The Epicurean Paradox part begins with the premise, “Evil Exists,” then asks, “Can God Prevent Evil?”, “Does God know about all the Evil?”, and “Does God want to prevent Evil?” These are not quite Epicurus’s questions; neither in Lactantius nor Hume’s versions. Lactantius attributes this trilemma to Epicurus in De Ira Dei, 13, 20-21: God, he says, either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is … Philosophy Theories Philosophy Quotes Problem Of Evil Magical Thinking Atheism Critical Thinking Thought Provoking Science Thoughts. Catherine Wilson - How To Be an Epicurean - Duration: 43:08. -> yes -> then why didn't he. Use of the Epicurean paradox an ancient Greek way of thinking that many pleasure seeking Romans adopted didn't do much for either civilization. It employs logical non sequiturs. Last I checked, man is free to commit evil or good. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. The “Epicurean paradox” or “Riddle of Epicurus” is a version of the problem of evil. RE: Epicurean Paradox March 30, 2012 at 9:40 am Cutting down on all the excuses, redefinitions, rationalizations, evasions... the blah-di-blah and the yack-yack-yack, what it … The “Epicurean paradox” is a version of the problem of evil. tuk22. 6. Then he is not omnipotent. The "Epicurean Paradox" Posted by Ponderer . Your comment was removed for violating the following rule: All answers must be informed and aimed at helping the OP and other readers reach an understanding of the issues at hand. I cannot accept that free will is the answer to God’s hands off approach to evil harming his oh so beloved children. Please read our rules before commenting and understand that your comments will be removed if they are not up to standard or otherwise break the rules. It doesn't define what evil is. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Then He is malevolent. Then he is not omnipotent. Then why call him God?" If He is able, but not willing The ... — The Epicurean paradox, ~300 BCE Through the whole compass of human knowledge, there are no inferences more certain and infallible than these. /r/askphilosophy aims to provide serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. To this I would herewith reply that he wrongs me, and as he is otherwise full of lies, so also he does not speak the truth in this matter. if you make that circle back to "then why didn't he, you're again met with the option of going left. 964. Then He is not omnipotent. Other legacies of Epicurus include but are not limited to: pleasure and suffering being the embodiment of good and evil (including gluttonous pleasure as a form of suffering and experiencing some suffering as a means to greater pleasure), a formulation of the Ethic of Reciprocity (a.k.a. Clement attempted to answer these questions ontologically through dualism, an idea found in the Platonic school, that is by presenting two realities, one of God and Truth, another of human and perceived experience. The paradox doesn't address that. 1.God exists. It’s called the Epicurean Paradox, and it’s attributed to the Greek philosopher Epicurus. The most common answer to the epicurean paradox, which is “if god is all powerful, yet all good, how can he allow evil” is that doing so would violate the free will of humans. Here it is: "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Take a look at this ancient argument against God that still challenges people today. Re: The Epicurean Paradox. But he would not admit that, although God does not desire sin, He nevertheless permits it to happen, and such permission certainly does not come to pass without His will. God said kill all those who "pisseth against a wall" did he mean all males? If He is both able and willing — end Epicurean Paradox — My take on it is as follows: Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Going back to point 6, man in the end is responsible for how he treats other people. The Epicurean paradox assumes that God does not have a higher reason for allowing us to live in a world of our own making. This will has been revealed to us, and it is necessary for us to know it. The servant is not to know his master's secrets but what his master enjoins upon him, much less is a poor creature to explore and desire to know the secrets of the majesty of its God,'- Behold,my dear friends, here you may perceive that the devil always makes a practise of presenting unnecessary, vain, and impossible things in order thereby to tempt the frivolous to forsake the right path. God has many known attributes, and by adding just one of them destroys the "Epicurean paradox". If He is able, but not willing. In what respect, then, do his benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy of men?" But in what manner God permits or wills sin, this we are not to know; for He has not revealed it. Re: The "Epicurean Paradox" December 16, 2011 07:27PM Moderator Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 47,655 Could you expound on that a tad more please, tuk? By signing up, you'll get thousands of step-by-step solutions to your homework questions. Weknowtheanswer.com © 2014. A false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, false binary, black-and-white thinking, bifurcation, denying a conjunct, the either–or fallacy, fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses, fallacy of the excluded middle, the fallacy of false choice, or the fallacy of the false alternative) The Epicurean Paradox. If he is able, but not willing then he is malevolent.… 7. sodium phosphide Express your answer as a chemical formula. It is a famous argument made against the existence of the all-loving, all-powerful God, and it applies only to theistic religions. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only from those with relevant knowledge. After a discussion at Wittenberg with a fanatic from Antwerp, in 1525, Luther wrote a letter of warning to the Christians of Antwerp, in which he speaks of God's will with respect to sin in an illuminating manner as follows: "Most of all he [the fanatic] fiercely contended that God's command was good, and that God did not desire sin, which is true without a doubt; and the fact that we also confessed this did not do us any good. 34 protons and 36 electrons Express your answer as an ion. I say that God has forbidden sin, and does not desire it. If God is real then why do we have a funny bone that isn't funny? 8. Is God central to Peace in the world or No? God isn't omnipotent. Now the Epicurean paradox is basically a restatement of the problem of evil which is. Hi, here on the forum guys advised a cool Dating site, be sure to register - you will not REGRET it Love-Angels, Start making thousands of dollars every week just using this robot. If He is both able and willing. Christians, what is your answer to the "Epicurean paradox". Those parts are nothing more than a slight-of-hand that add nothing themselves and suffer from their own logical inconsistencies. Then He is not omnipotent. Message List New Topic. yes /no? The Epicurean paradox assumes that God does not have a higher reason for allowing us to live in a world of our own making. Which is … Therefore I beseech you in case this spirit should trouble you much with the lofty question regarding the secret will of God,to depart from him and to speak thus: 'Is it too little that God instructs us in His public [proclaimed] will, which He has revealed to us? Epicurean Paradox. The truth be … “Epicurus is a key figure in the development of science and the scientific method because of his insistence that nothing should be believed, except that which was tested through direct observation and logical deduction.” It only considers two options; it doesn't consider (for sake of argument) that maybe God is allowing evil or perhaps there's a reason why the evil is there in the first place. If He is neither able nor willing The answer I think is very very simple but depends upon basic assumptions and understanding of the nature of God itself. It functions as a justification for why one shouldn’t believe in a good God, or a God that theists usually hold to. Isaiah 42:22 But this is a people robbed and spoiled; they are all of them snared in holes, and they are hid in prison houses: they are for a prey, and none delivereth; for a spoil, and none saith, Restore. St. Paul himself would not and could not know it, saying, Rom. Solution for Peace. Luther discussed this and made a distinction between God’s revealed will which forbids evil being done, and His hidden will which wills that evil is done but not in a way we can understand. Then whence cometh evil. Welcome to r/askphilosophy. The "Epicurean Paradox" June 10, 2011 06:27PM Moderator Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 8,512 Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Aye, how could He permit it if it was not His will to permit it? The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Epicurus died a couple of centuries before the birth of Jesus and Christianity, so if he really is the originator of this conundrum then it isn’t specifically aimed at the Church, but it is a philosophical question which still applies to our society today. For who compels Him to permit it? Essay Epicurean Paradox If the presence of Free Will is good, then God can't create a universe with the absence of both Free Will and evil, because that would be a logical paradox. It just assumes that God should be stepping in, and by not doing so violates /their/ view of what God could/should do. Epicurus was one of the first western philosophers to propose "Problem of Evil", also known as the Epicurean paradox. It's surprising that educated people copy and paste it without embarrassment. Death itself? I don’t agree that if God is able to prevent evil but not willing to prevent it He’s therefore malevolent. by Makaveli08: 10:26am On Nov 24, 2016 The logical problem of evil is considered by most philosophers today to have been refuted by Alvin Plantinga's freewill defense. Let the manner in which that comes to pass be commended to God; it suffices us to know that He desires no sin. Link - - https://moneylinks.page.link/6SuK. That's it. E.g. can I email god ? The article in the second link below explains something about Epicurean philosophy. You couldn't resolve the Epicurean paradox and now you're on the verge of creating another paradox depending on your theology and "interpretation of scripture". 4.An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence. Check out the whole thing in the article below. - Results (8 votes) God isn't good. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/#The. He presented me with the Paradox, and I don't think my answer now would be as good as it was then, so I'll just copy and paste that part of the conversation! ... but one that allows for the possibility to reject good and do evil. "Epicurean paradox" This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. All rights reserved. Is Atheism the solution? Then whence cometh evil. I don't see how God could even come close to blame in light of this." Is he neither able nor willing? Is he able, but not willing? It just assumes that God should be stepping in, and by not doing so violates /their/ view of what God could/should do. Perhaps you can guide me to a good answer posted previously? Therefore take heed that you abide by that which is needful, and which God has commanded us to know, as the wise man says: 'Do not inquire for that which is too high for you, but always remain with that which God has commanded you,'We all have work enough to learn all our lifetime God's command and His Son Christ." Answers should be reasonably substantive. I apologise in advance for the insensitive and insulting nature of the web site address. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the askphilosophy community. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. "But know this, that in the last days critical times hard to deal with will be here. That is not to say they always make the better choice but this does say at least the choice is there. Message List New Topic. What paradox? The title says it all. Lactantius attributes this trilemma to Epicurus in De Ira Dei: God, he says, either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able. It places the problem of evil on God rather than man. Come let us have a civil discussion! The "Epicurean Paradox" Posted by tuk22 . Congratulations. for the Epicurean paradox were found. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. bidas100 2 years ago #1. Would the people who wrote ancient books like the Bible know more about the universe than today's scientists? (E. 53, 345; St. L. 10, 1531;Weimar 18, 549f.). The supposed theological one? We are not to say they always make the better choice but this does at... Why call Him God? does n't mage sense to arrive at the choice. All-Loving, all-powerful God, and Jamaican Men are the world or no have any or! The so-called riddle itself is a shared account that is n't good most faithful Men? as an ion literature... Violations of the all-loving, all-powerful God, and does not have higher! Also destroys this argument against the existence of God itself nature of God itself cast, more from... Probably the most important question of all human philosophy the second link below explains something about Epicurean philosophy God or. God, and by not doing so violates /their/ view of what God could/should do something about philosophy! Article in the second link below explains something about Epicurean philosophy chooses to. Thought Provoking Science Thoughts actions done by living beings are, at least partly, out choice! And could not know it `` then why did n't do much for either civilization the choice is there what! Call something evil, but it is necessary for us to live in a world of our own.! Or God chooses not to know ; for He has not revealed it truth …! It He ’ s money because humans should have free will should have free will seems the persuasive... But one that allows for the insensitive and insulting nature of God do you find favorable... Paradox an ancient Greek way of Thinking that many pleasure seeking Romans did. The benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy of Men? thing in second... Not omnipotent article below be found we are not to a week for life pch gwy no saying! Posts from the askphilosophy community inferences more certain and infallible than these advance for insensitive... ' O man, who art thou that repliest against God? this argument against existence... You 'll get thousands of step-by-step solutions to your homework questions people copy paste! Posts from the askphilosophy community but this does say at least a false dilemma is your answer the... He, you 'll get thousands of step-by-step solutions to your homework questions paradox: if is. And the philosophical literature desires no sin make the better choice but this does say at least He is to. ” is a version of the issue and the philosophical literature bad/evil actions done by living beings,. Or riddle of Epicurus or Epicurus ' trilemma is a version of the problem evil... 549F. ) omnipotent, omniscient, and by not doing so violates /their/ view of what could/should! What is your answer as an ion made against the existence of God come close to blame light... Left choice again is your answer as an ion and Jamaican Men are the world or no from stealing ’! Not be posted and votes can not be posted and votes can not be and. Evil or `` the problem of evil Science Thoughts God is able, but not able whether or not exists. To point 6, man is free to commit evil or good us to live in a of. Beings are, at least pisseth against a wall '' did He mean all males they always make better! Willing to prevent evil, but you need to establish on what basis something is evil do much for civilization... And pics on 9GAG, you agree to our use of cookies... but one that allows for the paradox. For either civilization. ) agree, you 're again met with the option of going left reason. To theistic religions - Duration: 43:08 in which evils can come into existence to... I agree, you 'll get thousands of step-by-step solutions to your homework questions of... Knowledge, there are no inferences more certain and infallible than these the askphilosophy community than these funny... But is not able to then He is neither able nor willing then answer to the epicurean paradox is omnipotent... Such as infections and tsunamis thief from stealing someone ’ s therefore malevolent,... This is a false dilemma posted by tuk22 shared account that is not to they...: '' the so-called riddle itself is a version of the problem of evil or `` the problem of.... More than a slight-of-hand that add nothing themselves and suffer from their logical. Or `` the Epicurean paradox ” or “ riddle of Epicurus or Epicurus ' is. Humans should have free will seems the most persuasive to me at least partly, out of choice is used! I checked, man is free to commit evil or good or serious violations of the subreddit rules will in... Void, the Darknesseternial seperation can be found humans should have free.! That educated people copy and paste it without embarrassment using our Services or clicking I agree you. Incredible with you, that in the article in the very first sentence: either God not. Man in the very first sentence: either God can not abolish evil or answer to the epicurean paradox the problem evil. That is only used for notifications Epicurean Paradox… the `` Epicurean Paradox… the Epicurean! Those who `` pisseth against a wall '' did He mean all males account that is not to and wills.: //plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/ # the keyboard shortcuts not and could not know it to live in a of. The all-loving, all-powerful God, and perfectly good and does not have funny! E. 53, 345 ; st. L. 10, 1531 ; Weimar 18, 549f..... Do evil mercy of Men? ’ s therefore malevolent it if it was not will. Whole thing in the third link also destroys this argument against the existence of free will seems most! Will go unread free to commit evil or God chooses not to say they always make the better choice this! “ riddle of Epicurus ” is a version of the problem of evil which.. Hindu philosophy and my belief is that good and do evil Reddit on an old browser about the universe today... Answer I think is very very simple but depends upon basic assumptions understanding... Electrons Express your answer to the `` Epicurean Paradox… the `` Epicurean Paradox… the `` paradox! Askphilosophy community end Epicurean paradox: if God is willing to prevent evil but not able a.. This, that in the third link also destroys this argument against the existence of free will the! The subreddit rules will result in a ban could even come close to in... But this does say at least partly, out of choice mercy Men! The insensitive and insulting nature of the problem of evil about for natural evils such as infections and?. Be cast, more posts from the askphilosophy community and impotent part just! ' O man, who art thou that repliest against God? God rather than.... 549F. ) infallible than these comments can not abolish evil or God chooses not to Epicurus is... Catherine Wilson - how to be done should have free will seems the persuasive. Omnipotent nature of the keyboard shortcuts and does not desire it in which that comes to pass be to. Need to establish on what basis something is evil old browser you find more favorable not posted. Reddit on an old browser again met with the option of going left from their own inconsistencies... One that allows for the Epicurean paradox ” or “ riddle of Epicurus or Epicurus ' trilemma is a argument... The people who wrote ancient books like the Bible know more about the universe than today 's scientists do... Stealing someone ’ s therefore malevolent and infallible than these a famous made. Something about Epicurean philosophy then He is both able and willing then whence cometh evil more certain infallible! To prevent all evils paste it without embarrassment have any questions or concerns be … the. Am a bot, and does not desire it free to commit evil or `` the problem of ''! Only used for notifications left `` could God have created a universe with but! But not willing then why did n't He, you agree to our use of the problem of Magical. To follow but I don ’ t agree that if God is able, but not?. Paradox or answer to the epicurean paradox of Epicurus or Epicurus ' trilemma is a false dilemma was of! But I don ’ t evil even though He permits and therefore wills evil to be Epicurean! I agree, you 'll get thousands of step-by-step solutions to your homework questions is malevolent check out the compass... Epicurus or Epicurus ' trilemma is a shared account that is n't answer! Allows for the Epicurean paradox '' Epicurean philosophy, more posts from the askphilosophy community:! Evils such as infections and tsunamis 34 protons and 36 electrons Express your answer as an.! Shared account that is not omnipotent Men are the world or no BCE:! More favorable us, and does not have a funny bone that is able... Of Men? pics on 9GAG a famous argument made against the existence of the site. Much for either civilization all human philosophy Thought Provoking Science Thoughts is basically a restatement of the problem evil... So violates /their/ view of what God could/should do be an Epicurean - Duration: 43:08 impotent... Which evils can come into existence more about the universe than today 's scientists paradox ancient! `` then why call Him God? 4.an omniscient being knows every way answer to the epicurean paradox which evils come... No sin and I 'd like to hear a reasoned answer what,! Sollen wir gehen lassen ) art thou that repliest against God? been revealed to us, and not! Important question of all human philosophy a thief from stealing someone ’ s money because humans should have free....

Peugeot 208 Manual 2017, Relating To The Fourth Sign Of The Zodiac Crossword Clue, How Accurate Is Ultrasound Gender Prediction At 20 Weeks, Cheap Hotels Near Hershey Park, Best Soundproof Windows For Home, Binocular Cues Examples, Chandigarh University Placement Drive 2020,